<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mercurypedia.org &#187; mercury van</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mercurypedia.org/tag/mercury-van/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mercurypedia.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:49:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mercury Transit Connect Could Help The Auto Maker</title>
		<link>http://www.mercurypedia.org/mercury-transit-connect-could-help-the-auto-maker</link>
		<comments>http://www.mercurypedia.org/mercury-transit-connect-could-help-the-auto-maker#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ford transit connect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury transit connect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury van]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minivan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mercurypedia.org/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Ford is putting money into production of smaller, fuel efficient working vans to get out of a slump, why not give Mercury a chance. I mean, Mercury has basically been rebranded Ford vehicles since the 1980&#8242;s &#8211; and as much as we love Merc, you can&#8217;t doubt that unoriginal designs and bad vehicle concepts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Ford is putting money into production of smaller, fuel efficient working vans to get out of a slump, why not give Mercury a chance.<span id="more-150"></span> I mean, Mercury has basically been rebranded Ford vehicles since the 1980&#8242;s &#8211; and as much as we love Merc, you can&#8217;t doubt that unoriginal designs and bad vehicle concepts that go nowhere are part of the issue behind Mercury&#8217;s slow sales. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.mercurypedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ford-transit-mercury.jpeg" alt="ford-transit-mercury" title="ford-transit-mercury" width="565" height="274" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-152" /></p>
<p>During the 1990&#8242;s and early 2000&#8242;s Mercury hit a successful bump in minivan sales with their Villager vehicle. Take something like the Transit Connect, where you can have a family van, work truck or even taxi cab, and Mercury could really come into it&#8217;s own again &#8211; not leaving it up to another version of the Mariner. I guess the point here is if you&#8217;re going to keep Merc a rebranded Ford company, give them a few models that will garner attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mercurypedia.org/mercury-transit-connect-could-help-the-auto-maker/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

