<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mercurypedia.org &#187; mercury news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mercurypedia.org/tag/mercury-news/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mercurypedia.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:06:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Mercury is Gone &#8211; And We Are Poorer For It</title>
		<link>http://www.mercurypedia.org/mercury-is-gone-and-we-are-poorer-for-it</link>
		<comments>http://www.mercurypedia.org/mercury-is-gone-and-we-are-poorer-for-it#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ford kills mercury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury cougar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury sable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury topaz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mercurypedia.org/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 71-year old Mercury brand marks the 4th recent American auto maker to kick the bucket. Following in the footsteps of Saturn, Hummer and Pontiac &#8211; Ford&#8217;s press department announced that the iconic brand would be cut down. It&#8217;s hard to be surprised &#8211; Mercury has not created an original model wince the 1990&#8217;s &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 71-year old Mercury brand marks the 4th recent American auto maker to kick the bucket.<span id="more-280"></span> Following in the footsteps of Saturn, Hummer and Pontiac &#8211; Ford&#8217;s press department announced that the iconic brand would be cut down. It&#8217;s hard to be surprised &#8211; Mercury has not created an original model wince the 1990&#8217;s &#8211; taking Ford models like Tempo, Taurus, Crown Vic and transforming them into rebranded Topaz, Sable and Grand Marquis alike. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.automopedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/dead_mercury.jpg"><img src="http://www.automopedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/dead_mercury.jpg" alt="" title="dead_mercury" width="535" height="269" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4359" /></a></p>
<p>Ford reported that the Mercury name had a 74% decline in sales since 2000. Those are low numbers indeed, but the Merc label did retain some brand loyalty &#8211; the same company which gave us the Cougar muscle car and 1940&#8217;s Hot Rod Mercury Coupes.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.automopedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/1951-mercury-coupe-_460x0w.jpg"><img src="http://www.automopedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/1951-mercury-coupe-_460x0w.jpg" alt="" title="1951-mercury-coupe--_460x0w" width="534" height="400" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4361" /></a></p>
<p>The company began as a Ford offshoot in 1939 by Edsel Ford. &#8220;The All New Mercury&#8221; started off selling two-door coupes and large family sedans, all made without a huge influence from Ford design. During the muscle car era, Mercury became infamous with its sexy and fun to drive Cougar. That model continues into the late 90&#8217;s, before it (the last original Mercury vehicle) was laid to rest.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.automopedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/69_mercury_cougar+lights_on_front.jpg"><img src="http://www.automopedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/69_mercury_cougar+lights_on_front.jpg" alt="" title="69_mercury_cougar+lights_on_front" width="533" height="293" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4362" /></a></p>
<p>Mercury tried to re-imagine itself over the past few years &#8211; with sexy lady Jill Wagner (pictured above, shooting a Mercury Tracer at 500 rounds per second) selling you the Milan and Mariner. But alas &#8211; no one was buying. <em>Why get a Mercury Milan when you can buy a Ford Taurus?</em> Then the gas crisis came. Then the economic crisis came. Then&#8230;cash for clunkers. It was a no win scenario.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.automopedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/97_mercury_cougar_xr7-3.jpg"><img src="http://www.automopedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/97_mercury_cougar_xr7-3.jpg" alt="" title="97_mercury_cougar_xr7-3" width="533" height="320" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4363" /></a></p>
<p>But why are we poorer for losing a non-original make like Mercury? Because it was American, it was iconic and patriotic. We have already lost Pontiac, a company that had potential, but none were brave enough to invest. </p>
<p>Like them, Mercury has plenty of ideas, they could have taken chances &#8211; when your back is against the wall all you have left are chances. But it is easier for the auto companies to close assembly lines, lay off employees and cut production &#8211; try to salvage any bit of green so their Christmas bonuses are fat. And in the end, we lose a bit of what it means to be a motorhead in America. That makes us poorer.</p>
<p>Originally posted on our sister site, <a href="http://www.automopedia.org/">Automopedia.org </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mercurypedia.org/mercury-is-gone-and-we-are-poorer-for-it/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Is The End, Beautiful Mercury</title>
		<link>http://www.mercurypedia.org/this-is-the-end-beautiful-mercury</link>
		<comments>http://www.mercurypedia.org/this-is-the-end-beautiful-mercury#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[end of mercury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ending mercury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury cougar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury end production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury topaz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mercurypedia.org/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like the poet Jim Morrison once sang &#8211; &#8220;This is the end, my only friend, the end&#8230;&#8221; &#8211; it looks as though Mercury will soon be no more. Rumors have been circulating the world wide web since late last week &#8211; Ford is planning (yet again) on shutting down their Mercury brand &#8211; possibly to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the poet Jim Morrison once sang &#8211; &#8220;This is the end, my only friend, the end&#8230;&#8221; &#8211; it looks as though Mercury will soon be no more.<span id="more-272"></span> Rumors have been circulating the world wide web since late last week &#8211; Ford is planning (yet again) on shutting down their Mercury brand &#8211; possibly to help reshape an image or just save some money. In this auto economy anything is possible.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mercurypedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Mercury_Cougar.620.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-274" title="Mercury_Cougar.620" src="http://www.mercurypedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Mercury_Cougar.620.jpg" alt="" width="535" height="195" /></a></p>
<p>After a long standing relationship for 71 years with loyal customers, and the introduction of such icons as the Cougar, Mercury will join a the list of canceled brands including Saturn, Pontiac and Hummer. Declining sales and inability to differentiate itself from Ford are the key factors that help put one final nail in Merc&#8217;s coffin.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mercurypedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/old-mercury-car.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-273" title="old-mercury-car" src="http://www.mercurypedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/old-mercury-car.jpg" alt="" width="536" height="357" /></a></p>
<p>According to <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/drivers-seat/2010/05/29/mercury-the-next-domestic-car-brand-to-die/">The Wall Street Journal</a>: &#8220;Ford spokesman Mark Truby said the company’s plans for Mercury haven’t changed, meaning a previously outlined strategy for turning Mercury into “a smaller niche brand” remain intact. But niche brands typically survive only if they offer something special.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s with a sad heart we report this news &#8211; and hope the rumor continues to me just that. I can remember fondly my time with the Mercury name plate &#8211; driving my 1993 Topaz all over the Eastern Seaboard of the United States. I must have put 100,000 miles on the Merc before giving it up to another buyer, as I watched it pull away with someone else&#8217;s license plates attached I couldn&#8217;t help but wonder if I made a mistake. One day we may see a rebirth of Mercury (maybe we are putting it to an early grave) &#8211; but for now we sing a song to honor her on the way to automotive heaven:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="560" height="340" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XoXPZPnmBTU" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XoXPZPnmBTU" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mercurypedia.org/this-is-the-end-beautiful-mercury/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confirmed: Mercury Tracer for 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.mercurypedia.org/confirmed-mercury-tracer-for-2011</link>
		<comments>http://www.mercurypedia.org/confirmed-mercury-tracer-for-2011#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 ford focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 mercury tracer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury small car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury tracer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mercurypedia.org/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month we were all excited about possible news that Mercury, which is in need of a fresh small car audience, might bring back the Tracer. Well, it looks to be all but confirmed that the Tracer will return in 2011. The vehicle, which is still under development status, will be constructed using the 2010 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month we were all excited about possible news that Mercury, which is in need of a fresh small car audience, might <a href="http://www.mercurypedia.org/mercury-tracer-may-return-in-2011">bring back the Tracer</a>.<span id="more-236"></span> Well, it looks to be all but confirmed that the Tracer will return in 2011. The vehicle, which is still under development status, will be constructed using the 2010 &#8211; 2011 Ford Focus undercarriage and chassis. Tracer will be accompany &#8220;10 vehicles Ford is planning to unveil as a part of its global small car program that also includes the soon-to-come 2012 Ford Focus&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mercurypedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/focus.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-239" title="focus" src="http://www.mercurypedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/focus.jpg" alt="" width="523" height="314" /></a></p>
<p>Ford President of the Americas Mark Fields said during a meeting with U.S. auto dealers at the annual NADA convention &#8211; &#8220;The trend toward more fuel-efficient vehicles is very important, the trend toward (small) cars in general is coming back. We are responding to that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Along with new small car production at Ford / Mercury, it&#8217;s also been reported the American auto maker will gear vehicles towards hybrid and alternative energy sources, and focus more on diesel truck development.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://finchannel.com/news_flash/Oil_&amp;_Auto/58315_New_Mercury_Small_Car_to_be_Launched_by_Ford_in_2011/">Finchannel</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mercurypedia.org/confirmed-mercury-tracer-for-2011/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mercury Tracer May Return in 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.mercurypedia.org/mercury-tracer-may-return-in-2011</link>
		<comments>http://www.mercurypedia.org/mercury-tracer-may-return-in-2011#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 mercury tracer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury tracer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracer titanium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mercurypedia.org/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When on the hunt for automotive news, some people are lucky enough to stumble across patents marking brand names for new car models&#8230;. Such is the case with this brave Ford forum poster: who made an astonishing find when looking into new Mercury models:
FUSION TITANIUM
MILAN TITANIUM
 >>TRACER TITANIUM]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When on the hunt for automotive news, some people are lucky enough to stumble across patents marking brand names for new car models&#8230;.<span id="more-226"></span> Such is the case with this brave Ford forum poster: who made an astonishing find when looking into new Mercury models:</p>
<p><center>FUSION TITANIUM<br />
MILAN TITANIUM<br />
<strong> >>TRACER TITANIUM<< </strong><br />
ESCAPE TITANIUM<br />
FIESTA TITANIUM<br />
FOCUS TITANIUM<br />
TAURUS TITANIUM<br />
MARINER TITANIUM</p>
<p>All new marks filed in December of 2009. </center></p>
<p>That&#8217;s right &#8211; looks like Ford/Mercury are holding a spot for the &#8230;umm, classic&#8230;Mercury Tracer. Mercury Tracer, first introduced in 1987, was a compact car sold by the Mercury division of Ford Motor Company. It was based on the platform of the Mazda 323, replacing the European-derived Mercury Lynx, and was Mercury&#8217;s version of the Ford Escort. Stay tuned for updates on the Return of Tracer and thanks to <a href="http://www.blueovalforums.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=37413">BlueOvalForums</a> for the find!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mercurypedia.org/mercury-tracer-may-return-in-2011/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mercury Transit Connect Could Help The Auto Maker</title>
		<link>http://www.mercurypedia.org/mercury-transit-connect-could-help-the-auto-maker</link>
		<comments>http://www.mercurypedia.org/mercury-transit-connect-could-help-the-auto-maker#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ford transit connect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury transit connect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury van]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minivan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mercurypedia.org/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Ford is putting money into production of smaller, fuel efficient working vans to get out of a slump, why not give Mercury a chance. I mean, Mercury has basically been rebranded Ford vehicles since the 1980&#8217;s &#8211; and as much as we love Merc, you can&#8217;t doubt that unoriginal designs and bad vehicle concepts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Ford is putting money into production of smaller, fuel efficient working vans to get out of a slump, why not give Mercury a chance.<span id="more-150"></span> I mean, Mercury has basically been rebranded Ford vehicles since the 1980&#8217;s &#8211; and as much as we love Merc, you can&#8217;t doubt that unoriginal designs and bad vehicle concepts that go nowhere are part of the issue behind Mercury&#8217;s slow sales. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.mercurypedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ford-transit-mercury.jpeg" alt="ford-transit-mercury" title="ford-transit-mercury" width="565" height="274" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-152" /></p>
<p>During the 1990&#8217;s and early 2000&#8217;s Mercury hit a successful bump in minivan sales with their Villager vehicle. Take something like the Transit Connect, where you can have a family van, work truck or even taxi cab, and Mercury could really come into it&#8217;s own again &#8211; not leaving it up to another version of the Mariner. I guess the point here is if you&#8217;re going to keep Merc a rebranded Ford company, give them a few models that will garner attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mercurypedia.org/mercury-transit-connect-could-help-the-auto-maker/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goodnight Sweet Sable&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.mercurypedia.org/goodnight-sweet-sable</link>
		<comments>http://www.mercurypedia.org/goodnight-sweet-sable#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ford news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury montego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury sable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mercurypedia.org/goodnight-sweet-sable</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#8230;And flights of angels sing thee to thy rest. Yes Mercury sedan fans, it is a mournful time for us all, as Ford exclaimed their long-selling Mercury Sable will be no more after its 2009 season. 

Mercury&#8217;s Sable was for years a rebranded Ford Taurus, many times a more luxurious version containing V6, leather seating [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.mercurypedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/mercury-sable2008.jpg' alt='2008 Mercury Sable' /></p>
<p>&#8230;And flights of angels sing thee to thy rest. Yes Mercury sedan fans, it is a mournful time for us all, as Ford exclaimed their long-selling Mercury Sable will be no more after its 2009 season.<span id="more-43"></span> </p>
<p><img src='http://www.mercurypedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/mercury-sable2005.jpg' alt='2005 Mercury Sable' /></p>
<p>Mercury&#8217;s Sable was for years a rebranded Ford Taurus, many times a more luxurious version containing V6, leather seating and automatic extra features. Over the past few years Merc tried their Montego sedan out on the public, and after moderate sales decided to renamed the car a 21st century version of Sable. As of Spring 2009, thanks in part to Ford&#8217;s restructuring plan, the Sable will be no more. God speed midsized sedan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mercurypedia.org/goodnight-sweet-sable/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
